SoTL Process Infographic

So I updated the graphic and hopefully got rid of all the typos. I downloaded an accessible pdf file and will try to embed it. I keep updating it based on feedback. This is the process in very generic terms, and does not reflect the structure of a research paper. Hence, there is no individual item for literature as the engagement with both literature and ethics is dialogic throughout the entirety of the process. The reason for the ethics tab being at step 5 of the process is that all the preceding items will have to be clear and considered before handing in the ethics application.

This is my first try to create an infographic about the steps of a SoTL (Scholarship of Learning and Teaching) process, or educational inquiry. For text (pdf) version please click this link to a OneDrive file here.

Not based on Glassick et al

This is not an adaption of Glassick’s et al (1997) framework. This process is much older, in the 60s in the German speaking context (which I am from) Erziehungswissenschaften (educational sciences) has moved from a hermeneutic philosophical approach towards an empirical social science mindset (Fatke & Oelkers, 2014)**. In the 70s the founders of the Max Planck Institute for Bildungsforschung established that considerations of humanities ought to play a significant role in educational sciences (Zedler, 2002)*** , which is reflected in the processes used for education research (educational inquiries).

According to Fatke and Oelkers (2014) over the last decades the challenges of the theory-praxis-dilemma encountered in the discipline, has been easing off with the changes in the field: from trying to prove educational theories, to exploring praxis. Which is where the majority of SoTL projects find their home: to explore how to improve the development and growth of learners. (Zedler, 2002)

The graphic reflects my academic upbringing; albeit I neglected the much stronger positivist focus my alma mater promoted. It is generically the process educational research (educational inquiry)–outwith SoTL–traditionally follows, and which is reflected in various SoTL frameworks.

Let me know if this makes sense I will keep updating the graphic and context based on feedback. Mind you these are just the main points and I highlighted a couple of issues I have become aware off over the last years. What else is needed? Is tone of voice okay?

Nathalie

https://pubsecure.lucidpress.com/sotlprocess/

Links to Resources

*https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED461318

**https://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2014/9083/pdf/Falke_Oelkers_2014_Selbstverstaendnis_der_Erziehungswissenschaft.pdf

***https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-322-99634-3_2

Academic Development SOTL

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: